Olivia Tjandramulia vs Mijeong Park Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L L L W L L
Form
L L W L W L L W L WH2H: Tjandramulia 1 - 0 Park
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tjandramulia winning 2 and Park winning 0. The last match between Tjandramulia and Park was at the W25 Incheon, 09-06-2022, Second, Hard with Olivia Tjandramulia getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Olivia Tjandramulia | 1 |
| Mijeong Park | 0 |
W25 Incheon(09-06-2022)
6
2
6
3
| Tjandramulia | Stats | Park |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 899 | Ranking | N/A |
| 350 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 27 | Age | 25 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 0 | Titles | 0 |
| 46% (175-206) | Career Total W/L | 52% (27-25) |
| $4,725 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Rybakina VS Svitolina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Draper VS Berrettini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tjandramulia VS Park H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Olivia Tjandramulia
Player
Mijeong Park
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
Tjandramulia VS Park H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:17:0 | Average Match Time | 1:17:0 |
| 72% (33/46) | 1st Serve % | 56% (27/48) |
| 64% (21/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 44% (12/27) |
| 77% (10/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (10/21) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 100% (2/2) |
| 54% (26/48) | Return Points Win % | 33% (15/46) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Olivia Tjandramulia Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jia-Jing Lu
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
73
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elena Micic
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Tina Nadine Smith
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Elizabeth Mandlik
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve %
79%
(
30 of
38)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
6 of
30)
35%
(
6 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
39%
(
14 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
51
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dalila Jakupovic
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
27 of
37)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
55
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cristina Dinu
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
77%
(
46 of
60)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olivia Tjandramulia
Player
Adelina Lachinova
89%
(
70 of
79)
1st Serve %
44%
(
36 of
82)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
7
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
16 of
46)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
90
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucie Nguyen Tan
Player
Olivia Tjandramulia
59%
(
59 of
100)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
107)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
6
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
46 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
55 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Mijeong Park Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 3-6 6-3 10-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Yujin Ahn
Player
Mijeong Park
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
2
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Juae Shin
Player
Mijeong Park
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
6
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Subin Park
Player
Mijeong Park
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mijeong Park
Player
Yelin Kim
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Olivia Tjandramulia
Player
Mijeong Park
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mijeong Park
Player
Yeong Won Jeong
70%
(
7 of
10)
1st Serve %
60%
(
9 of
15)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
5 of
7)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
100%
(
3 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
17
Total Points Won
8
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 46% (175/206) | Win/Loss | 52% (27/25) |
| 47% (407/452) | Sets Win/Loss | 51% (59/56) |
| 49% (3824/4033) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (517/503) |
| 48% (116/126) | Hard Win/Loss | 52% (27/25) |
| 41% (36/52) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (17/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (6/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 147 | Aces Total | 7 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 538 | Total Double Faults | 39 |
| 1:13:22 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 534.47 | Average Opponent Rank | 275.15 |
| 71% (12953/18338) | 1st Serve % | 62% (403/645) |
| 55% (7186/12953) | 1st Serve Win % | 52% (209/403) |
| 45% (2415/5385) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (98/242) |
| 47% (1022/2190) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 58% (34/59) |
| 45% (8108/18114) | Return Points Win % | 43% (271/632) |
| 0% (0/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 15% (3/17) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (150/173) | Challenger W/L | 43% (6/8) |
| 63% (22/13) | Futures W/L | 55% (21/17) |
| 46% (171/369) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (26/51) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (36/63) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (4/8) |
| 43% (46/106) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (6/12) |
| 81% (184/149) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (26/24) |
| 18% (184/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (26/2) |
| 12% (197/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (26/3) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
